When I started out on my programming career, I collected software. Some of it was freeware, some shareware. Having heard of the ASP through word-of-mouth on BBSes, its reputation at the time was enough for me to prefer to get software which sported the ASP logo. This was its member’s greatest asset at the time. Being a member of the ASP told potential customers that the software was held to higher standards than the rest of the bunch; that it could be trusted. I knew then that when I got my shareware business going, I would aspire to ASP standards.
Fast forward fifteen or so years. I now have my shareware business. But the world has changed. The ASP logo on a piece of software still meant quality, but there was so much else available on the web which was of good quality from big companies with great reputations which had adopted the try-before-you-buy model that the presence of an ASP logo was no longer a deciding factor in the purchase of shareware. Not to mention that the high standards of ASP had been diluted to include feature-crippled software, software which timed-out and other practices which were frowned upon by the original ASP. But there was still enough shine on the old girl even if she was tarnished by age that I decided to join.
It was the memory of the old ASP that enticed me to join. It had been a dream of mine from the beginning and I still looked at ASP membership through a rose-tinted monitor. In truth, I could see no marketing advantage to being a member: I doubt that very many people even know that ASP stands for other than Active Server Pages. And then I discovered the newsgroups. The value of membership was no longer a message to potential customers that my software adhered to higher standards. It now provided valuable advice through its newsgroups and information on marketing and writing software through the newsletter and articles on the website. But I never would have known that had I not still seen the ASP as she was: a mark of sterling standards which proclaimed that here was software of a higher quality and trust.
I think that is the message the ASP must somehow shout to the world. We should write software which lives up to higher standards and be held accountable for it. The Safer Downloads program does this. And I think it should be a requirement of ASP membership that we adhere to its standards. It should not be an extra that we must pay for in addition to ASP membership. By requiring all member’s software adhere to the Safer Downloads standards, we will regain the reputation that flying the ASP banner once did.
This reputation alone would attract new members because it would give them an official method of saying to the world that here is shareware of a higher quality. The ASP logo should again be made to mean something to the world at large.